• NEWS
• TRENDING

Supreme Court rules in favour of Uber and Ola, says they are not acting as cartel

• NEWS
• TRENDING

Tata v. Mistry: C. A. Sundaram tells SC that Tata Sons should be a board managed company

• NEWS
• TRENDING

AIIMS vs Nurses: Delhi High Court restricts Nurses Union from continuing strike

• NEWS
• TRENDING

Landlord-Tenant Disputes under Transfer of Property Act arbitrable except when covered by Rent Control Laws: Supreme Court

• NEWS
• TRENDING

Delhi HC asks AAP & DDA to reply a contempt plea filed over seismic stability orders

• NEWS
• TRENDING

Delhi HC to Centre & AAP: Consider representation PIL claiming traffic challans mechanism under Motor Vehicle Act “faulty”

• INTERNATIONAL
• NEWS
• TRENDING

US: Court dismisses $100 million lawsuit filed against PM Modi, Amit Shah

• NEWS
• TRENDING

SC: AYUSH doctors can prescribe tablets to COVID-19 patients, not advertise

• NEWS
• TRENDING

California files petition to direct Amazon to obey with due subpoenas concerning COVID-19 policies

• NEWS
• TRENDING

No coercive action against Republic TV CFO till hearing: Mumbai police affirms

• NEWS

Tata v. Mistry: Sundaram tells SC that Tata Sons wanted to control decisions

• NEWS
• TRENDING

Delhi High Court: CBSE portraying “anti-student” attitude

• NEWS
• TRENDING

Binoy Viswam: Right to Privacy should be protected from “giant corporations”

• TRENDING

Siddique Kappan illegal detention: SC adjourns hearing till January 2021

• NEWS
• TRENDING

Delhi HC issued notice to Delhi Police and Centre Govt on Plea seeking ban on online gambling